Text & Content Analysis

Context: entity (hercules)  |  Window: 24h Β· 7d Β· 30d  |  Corpus: 1 articles

This page analyzes how a selected category, entity, or narrative frame appears in recent news coverage within the specified time window. Metrics and breakdowns are derived from the active article corpus.

Corpus KPIs

Entity
hercules
Window
Last 7 days
Articles
1
From
2026-04-04 10:00:00+00
To
2026-04-04 10:00:00+00
Range
2026-03-28 15:53:46.788785+00 β†’ 2026-04-04 15:53:46.788785+00
Who’s being talked about

Top Entities

Entity Label Mentions Actions
ai ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
april 4 2026 april 3 2026 DATE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
bluesky GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
bluesky share PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
bmj ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
can science predict when a study wont hold up WORK_OF_ART 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
china GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
covid19 ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
duke ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
email share PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
facebook share on x opens WORK_OF_ART 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
half CARDINAL 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
hercules GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
ivan oransky PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
linkedin GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
linkedin share ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
mailchimp PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
mastodon share PERSON 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
opens ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
paxil study 329 guest WORK_OF_ART 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
policies permitting llm use for polishing peer reviews are currently not enforceable WORK_OF_ART 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
predatory GPE 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
restoring trust in science storytelling WORK_OF_ART 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
retraction ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
retraction watch ORG 1 πŸ“Š πŸ” 🧲
Who’s talking

Top Sources (Domains)

Domain Articles % Actions
retractionwatch.com 1 100.00 πŸ“Š πŸ“° 🧲
How the stories are being framed

Top Narrative Frames

Frame Weight Actions
Technology 0.4100 πŸ“Š 🧲
Business, Companies 0.4000 πŸ“Š 🧲
Government 0.1600 πŸ“Š 🧲
Environment, Climate 0.0300 πŸ“Š 🧲
How it feels

Sentiment

Label Articles Actions
😐 Neutral 1 πŸ“Š 🧲

Articles included

Top entities
Top sources
Top narrative frames
Pub Date Category Domain Title Analyze Author Sent Score
2026-04-04 10:00:00+00 Science retractionwatch.com Weekend reads: Half of social science β€˜doesn’t replicate’; β€˜Scientific ghosts: Life after retraction’; multisensory learning paper retracted Analyze Retraction Watch Staff 😐 neutral 0.0888