SCROLL NEWS / DISCOVERY

Search headlines

Find the stories shaping the conversation.

Search mode
Refine results
Active filters Keyword All time

Results for " Jennifer Lawrence " 17 found 🔀 AI-powered Shuffle

My Mom, 60, Walked 30 Miles in Comfy Sneakers From the Brand Amal Clooney, 48, and Jennifer Lawrence, 35, Wear

An InStyle fashion editor’s 60-year-old mom swears by the Adidas VL Court 3.0 Sneakers for long days on her feet. Shop the travel-perfect pair while it’s on sale for $60 at Amazon for a limited time.

instyle.com logo
Apr 17 • 8:00 PM EDT • Technology • instyle.com
Whether you like it or not, celebrities have an impact on politics

The global groundswell of support for Macklemore’s pro-Palestinian advocacy serves to remind us that maybe celebrity activism really is that deep after all, writes Cheek’s Varsha Yajman. Subscribe In the last week, publications, podcasts, and influencers that have either rarely or never spoken about Israel’s genocide in Palestine have flooded my social feed. And it was all because singer Ed Sheeran and his team dropped Macklemore as his opener for saying “Free Palestine” on stage. Millions raised, millions speaking up in support of Palestine - all of this confirming my view that, whether I like it or not, celebrities do have an impact on political outcomes. And this is interesting when much of the time celebrity activism can induce an eye roll - I love to see Charli XCX pointing out a Palestinian flag in the crowd, but it’s hardly the bold symbol of allyship that some fans would make it out to be. But there’s a line between healthy scepticism and outright dismissal - and I’d argue that the latter lets the rich and powerful off far too easily. For instance, actress Jennifer Lawrence, once outspoken about her political views, last year told The Times she no longer believes celebrities have a role to play: “Celebrities do not make a difference whatsoever on who people vote for. So then what am I doing? I’m just sharing my opinion on something that’s going to add fuel to a fire that’s ripping the country apart.” While it’s a narrative she might find comfort in, it simply is not true. Grassroots movements often garner worldwide attention when celebrities and other high-profile spokespeople bring a mainstream platform to their causes. And this frustrates me. We have had three years of a live-streamed genocide. Macklemore himself has been calling for a Free Palestine long before he booked the Sheeran concert. Yet it’s the high-profile fallout of the last week that finally seems to have made saying “Free Palestine” socially acceptable in the mainstream. It feels like the collective mood has shifted, where calling out censorship is now the obvious response - not just the business of ‘radical’ activists. To recap, Sheeran’s decision followed an ultimatum from billionaire Robert Kraft, owner of Gillette Stadium, one of the venues Sheeran was scheduled to perform at: either drop Macklemore as your opener after only two of the eight scheduled shows, or you do not play at any stadiums. Sheeran’s disappointing decision to stand on the side of billionaire-led censorship has ultimately seen a surge in support for Free Palestine. It began when all his openers and his backing band pulled out of Sheeran’s tour, in solidarity with Macklemore and with the Palestinian cause. It was met with an uproar of support from those who had never or barely touched politics before: influencers lip-syncing to Macklemore’s music, singers like Jack Antonoff singing “Free Palestine,” and publications and podcasts standing with Macklemore. And finally, we saw material support: Macklemore donated $1 million in profits from his two nights opening for Sheeran’s tour to several Palestinian aid groups and called for Sheeran and Kraft to match it, which they have since promised to do. We’ve also seen children’s entertainer Ms Rachel follow suit with a $1 million donation to Palestinian aid, and publication PopBase has donated $10,000. Anera, a humanitarian aid group working in Palestine, Lebanon, and Jordan, said donations since Macklemore’s announcement were more than triple this month’s daily average. The group’s Instagram page has also gained 8,000 followers. Macklemore far from the first celebrity to speak and participate in politics in the Western World. In 1924, singer Al Jolson supported Republican candidate Warren G. Harding for president, and decades later, celebrities such as Harry Belafonte, Lena Horne, and Aretha Franklin voiced their public support for the Civil Rights movement. More recently, in the lead-up to the 2024 US election, ‘The Daily Show with Trevor Noah partnered with the organisation Power the Polls to recruit poll workers to address shortages- a problem disproportionately affecting voters of colour. The campaign saw 170,000 new sign-ups - 35,000 of which came directly through the TV show’s link - resulting in the recruitment of 713,000 total poll workers that year, an almost three-fold increase on the organisation’s goal. Alongside recruiting workers, celebrities in the US (where voting in elections is not compulsory) have made a huge difference by calling for people to register to vote. Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris in 2024 saw over 400,000 visitors on the voter registration site within 24 hours of her Instagram post. In 2023, Swift had urged her fans to register, resulting in 35,000 new voter registrations. Similarly, Ariana Grande promoted voter registration in 2019 by setting up booths at concerts on the American leg of her tour, resulting in over 33,000 voters registering. And the same thing is happening closer to home. This year, musician Jack River successfully called for government action to ensure creatives in Australia do not have their work scraped by generative AI companies. Celebrity as the mediator between the punter and the politician Celebrity activism isn’t just a feel-good news story - research tells us it actually makes a difference. By directing attention to issues affecting the average person, like voting inaccessibility or a lack of action on a genocide, researchers Alfred Archer and Amanda Cawston state that “celebrities can play a useful bridging role between political elites and the people they represent”. Alternatively, in a world where talking about politics is “not cool,” or where people lack exposure or knowledge to engage with politics, celebrities can act as an educational resource or an entry point into the political world - when they speak up about an issue, their audience gets exposed to it. Olivia Rodrigo’s Daisy Chain Fields festival is a perfect example. Rodrigo partnered with twelve organisations focused on women’s issues, such as reproductive rights. These organisations had stalls at the festival for people to meet them and were also featured heavily on social media, giving their issues global attention and raising $20 million for the organisations. We have also seen celebrities at award shows such as the Emmys wearing F*CK ICE pins, referring to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s treatment and detainment of people - generally people of colour. When celebrities speak up about political issues in public forums, they put the issue at the forefront of mainstream media, rally their supporters, and make it clear that, however much they disagree, the government cannot simply ignore it. Our over-reliance on celebrities versus our politicians As much as I love seeing my favourite celebrity use their platform for a good cause, there is an important question to ask: not whether celebrity activism is good or bad, but whether we should have to rely on celebrities. And the answer would, in an ideal world, be no. In an ideal world, or merely a just world, action on Palestine would’ve happened decades ago, climate change would be taken seriously, and most importantly, people would understand their democratic rights. However, that is not our reality. Only around 28 per cent of Australian Year 10 students reach proficiency in civics and citizenship. In the US, almost two-thirds of people under 30 say high school civics education didn’t prepare them to understand voting deadlines, how to research candidates, or how to vote by mail. When civics education is weak, our trust in these institutions and our understanding of change-making processes also decline. ​This is where celebrity steps in and becomes our main source of reliance. As Mary R. Connelly notes in _The Tartan, “_Celebrities will always be involved in campaigns in one form or another, but their presence is not what causes people to vote blindly. The lack of political engagement and literacy is what allows celebrities to wield their influence on the political sphere so impactfully.” About the author ​Varsha Yajman is the Digital Content Producer at Cheek Media. She is a youth advocate and lawyer with a background in climate litigation and is passionate about looking at the intersection between race, climate justice, and mental health. Thanks for reading Cheek Media Co. ! This post is public so feel free to share it. Share

cheekmedia.substack.com logo
Sep 21 • 3:54 AM EDT • Politics • cheekmedia.substack.com
Jennifer Lawrence To Star In Rom Com 'One Month Mark' For Apple

Jennifer Lawrence is attached to star in 'One Month Mark,' a romantic comedy with Apple aboard as studio.

deadline.com logo
Jun 11 • 2:45 PM EDT • Entertainment • deadline.com
Jennifer Lawrence says she lost part in Quentin Tarantino film because critics said she wasn't 'pretty enough'

Jennifer Lawrence says she lost a part in a buzzy Quentin Tarantino movie because trolls said she wasn't 'pretty enough' to play it: 'The internet just, like, went out of their way to call me ugly.'

ew.com logo
Jan 16 • 12:15 PM EST • Entertainment • ew.com
How Jennifer Lawrence mended fences with Kourtney Kardashian after public spat

A reconciliation for Kourtney Kardashian Barker and Jennifer Lawrence is in the Kards.

centraloregondaily.com logo
Oct 9 • 9:05 AM EDT • Entertainment • centraloregondaily.com
Jennifer Lawrence Gets Her 'One Month Mark' Director In Gene Stupnitsky

Jennifer Lawrence will reunite with her No Hard Feelings director Gene Stupnitsky for the new romantic comedy One Month Mark.

deadline.com logo
Oct 2 • 1:15 PM EDT • Entertainment • deadline.com
Jennifer Lawrence teaming up with ‘Weapons’ director Zach Cregger for sci-fi thriller ‘The Flood’

Jennifer Lawrence is joining forces with ‘Weapons’ filmmaker Zach Cregger for his next movie, the sci-fi thriller ‘The Flood.’

ew.com logo
Sep 29 • 8:19 PM EDT • Entertainment • ew.com
Jennifer Lawrence teaming up with “Weapons” director Zach Cregger for sci-fi thriller “The Flood”

The film hits theaters on Aug. 11, 2028.

yahoo.com logo
Sep 29 • 8:19 PM EDT • Entertainment • yahoo.com
What to Stream: 'Stranger Things,' Jennifer Lawrence, 'Ne Zha II' and Kate Winslet

Jennifer Lawrence playing a new mother whose behavior becomes increasingly erratic in “Die My Love” and three more “Stranger Things” episodes are some of the new television, films, music and

lancasteronline.com logo
Dec 22, 2025 • 1:54 AM EST • Entertainment • lancasteronline.com
Deep dive
😐 Neutral (15%)
wow
74%
love
26%
Jennifer Lawrence reveals what cosmetic work she’s had, what plastic surgery she wants to get

Jennifer Lawrence opened up about the cosmetic procedures she has undergone, including baby botox.

ew.com logo
Sep 4 • 12:39 PM EDT • Entertainment • ew.com
Apple Lands Hot Rom-Com Package ‘One Month Mark’, With Jennifer Lawrence To Star And Produce Project From Sophie Fleur De Bruijn And Chernin Entertainment

After an auction that saw 40 buyers put in offers before Chernin Entertainment landed rights, the highly sought spec One Month Mark has not only landed an A-list star but also found a studio to call h...

yahoo.com logo
Jun 11 • 2:45 PM EDT • Entertainment • yahoo.com
Andy Cohen reveals Jennifer Lawrence figured out how the 'Summer House' reunion leaked

After Bravo's three-part reunion for 'Summer House,' host Andy Cohen revealed the A-list actress who helped the network find the culprit of the viral leaked audio.

ew.com logo
Jun 9 • 9:48 PM EDT • Entertainment • ew.com
Jennifer Lawrence says she lost out on Tarantino role because she wasn’t pretty enough

Jennifer Lawrence may have starred in box office smashes such as “The Hunger Games” and the “X-Men” franchise, but she has missed out on at least one major movie role — and this, she says, is down to her looks.

cnn.com logo
Jan 16 • 8:30 AM EST • Entertainment • cnn.com
Jennifer Lawrence to star in 'The Flood' from director Zach Cregger

Jennifer Lawrence attends the Christian Dior Haute Couture Week Spring/Summer 2026 show as part of Paris Fashion Week on Jan. 26, 2026, in Paris, France. (Arnold Jerocki/Getty Images for Christian

kmaland.com logo
Sep 30 • 5:00 PM EDT • Entertainment • kmaland.com
What Oscars best actress winners wore on the red carpet

From Julie Andrews' elbow-length gloves to Jennifer Lawrence's strapless gown, here's what best actress winners have worn to the Oscars.

businessinsider.com logo
Mar 15 • 10:14 AM EDT • Business • businessinsider.com
Golden Globes 2026 best red carpet looks: Jennifer Lawrence, Dakota Fanning, Hudson Williams and more arrive in style

Celebrities arrive in style on the Golden Globes red carpet.

yahoo.com logo
Jan 11 • 8:53 PM EST • Entertainment • yahoo.com
Jennifer Lawrence accidentally took Ambien before Philip Seymour Hoffman dance scene for 'Hunger Games'

Jennifer Lawrence recalls accidentally taking Ambien and 'hallucinating' while filming her dance scene with Philip Seymour Hoffman for 'The Hunger Games: Catching Fire': 'Elizabeth Banks got really annoyed with me.'

ew.com logo
Dec 25, 2025 • 10:00 PM EST • Entertainment • ew.com