SCROLL NEWS / DISCOVERY
Search headlines
Find the stories shaping the conversation.
Results for " adding " 17,507 found 🔀 AI-powered Shuffle
Fantasy Baseball 2-Start Pitcher Rankings: Braxton Ashcraft, Kyle Harrison among top streaming options this week
2 men facing charges after business trailer, tools stolen in Dundee
Business - Oil rises, stocks fall as Iran war enters fifth week and further escalation looms
States pay Deloitte, others millions to comply with Trump law to cut Medicaid rolls
Influential Lefty San Fran Supervisor breaks silence on resignation rumors and personal health crisis
NCAA tournament takeaways: UConn reaches Final Four on wild game winner over Duke; UConn and UCLA women each pull away in Elite Eight
Howie Roseman reveals new Eagles free agent signing
Philadelphia is adding another edge rusher.
March Madness Final Four schedule, how to watch: Keep up with UConn-Illinois, Michigan-Arizona in Indianapolis
Eagles agree to one-year deal with Joe Tryon-Shoyinka
The Eagles are adding a former first-round pick to their defense.
Navigating the social media minefield
Scientists and researchers seeking to announce promising findings, exchange ideas or contribute to policy discussions outside of academic circles may find social media an expedient tool.But increasingly, scientists and other professionals are discovering that online platforms can be a double-edged sword: while sharing their work and expertise is crucial for visibility and meeting funder expectations, it also exposes them to baseless criticism and even accusations of spreading false information."It is getting harder and harder for scientists, and researchers in general, to convey their findings without facing attacks on their legitimacy and accuracy of their research," says Valère Ndior, a professor of public law at the University of Western Brittany in Brest, France, who has spent more than a decade studying misinformation on social media. Researchers attempting to challenge deceptive online information may themselves be accused of political bias or not being objective in their research, he explains, adding that some scientists disengage because they feel overwhelmed and unable to sustain meaningful dialogue. "It is quite sad to see in some instances that researchers end up leaving social media altogether because they feel like the pressure is getting too intense or feel threatened," he says.Ndior, a past president of the Francophone Network of International Law, is also involved in European efforts to make science and research findings more accessible to the public. As an ambassador for the Science Comes to Town (SCTT) project, he has participated in recent discussions on public perceptions of science and online misinformation. The European Commission-funded initiative connects Brest and two other cities — Kiel in Germany and Split in Croatia — and aims to strengthen ties between communities, universities and research institutions to promote science awareness and cooperation across Europe.Coordinated campaigns around contentious topicsNdior draws a clear distinction between critical thinking and thoughtless criticism. Yet he sees online discussions being increasingly shaped by suspicious behaviour and coordinated information campaigns — including "raids" aimed at dominating discussions and "astroturfing," where small groups act as larger movements to sway debates. Tracking these patterns has become harder because some platforms have restricted data or charge for it, despite provisions of the European Union's Digital Securities Act aimed at ensuring researchers can have access to such data. According to Ndior, "platforms became more reluctant from the moment access to data became a legal requirement rather than a voluntary initiative."Unfounded claims and scepticism about science existed long before Internet chat groups. But the noticeable rise in online hostility has intensified around contentious topics, such as the coronavirus pandemic and climate change, alongside the weakening of gatekeepers to moderate content.For Ndior, dubious claims about pandemic countermeasures and vaccine safety highlighted the struggle between "balancing freedom of expression and the protection of public health and order." Efforts to remove social media content deemed false or risky for public health triggered accusations of censorship and the silencing of legitimate discussion, and in some cases, legal challenges.Concerns about attacks on the credibility of scientists and researchers have generated a flurry of academic papers in recent years and prompted professional communities to address ways to counter online attacks. Such unease extends to the generation that has grown up with digital media. Ndior points out that his students, some of whom research artificial intelligence regulation, hate speech, online surveillance and other controversial topics, hesitate to share their work or viewpoints online. "Many of them don't want to expose themselves too much because they don't feel ready to be faced with the backlash of other people criticising their research," he explains.Safer harbours for engagementLegal challenges against false or defamatory posts are not necessarily a solution — especially given the trans-jurisdictional nature of the Internet. Lawsuits also take time and money, and if they fail, can be counterproductive. Instead, Ndior advises scientists and researchers to be selective in how and where they communicate. Professional online platforms and moderated discussion spaces offer a better environment for engagement. He also highlights the value of more traditional formats, such as radio interviews and in-person discussions at schools, libraries and science fairs, which encourage dialogue with the public. "Personal contact makes a big difference," he says, while acknowledging that these approaches lack the global reach of social media.Ndior’s interest in digital law and online misinformation stems from his time as a doctoral student in international law in the early days of social media. He began analysing posts from governments and heads of state to determine if they could be considered official and thus used as evidence in litigation. His work attracted media attention and led to conference and speaking invitations. "This was not part of my plan," he says, "but this is what happens as a researcher — your interest is sparked by a certain event or phenomenon, and it suddenly becomes your focus."Ndior believes SCTT provides "a double benefit" for researchers, enabling them to connect with peers and interact with the public. "There is a wide community of people who are not in academia who are critical thinkers looking for opportunities to ask questions, to get information and contribute their ideas,” he says. "I really value that kind of feedback."Science|Business, which connects policymakers, academics and industry through its news reporting, analysis and events, is an SCTT partner.
Navigating the social media minefield
Scientists and researchers seeking to announce promising findings, exchange ideas or contribute to policy discussions outside of academic circles may find social media an expedient tool.But increasingly, scientists and other professionals are discovering that online platforms can be a double-edged sword: while sharing their work and expertise is crucial for visibility and meeting funder expectations, it also exposes them to baseless criticism and even accusations of spreading false information."It is getting harder and harder for scientists, and researchers in general, to convey their findings without facing attacks on their legitimacy and accuracy of their research," says Valère Ndior, a professor of public law at the University of Western Brittany in Brest, France, who has spent more than a decade studying misinformation on social media. Researchers attempting to challenge deceptive online information may themselves be accused of political bias or not being objective in their research, he explains, adding that some scientists disengage because they feel overwhelmed and unable to sustain meaningful dialogue. "It is quite sad to see in some instances that researchers end up leaving social media altogether because they feel like the pressure is getting too intense or feel threatened," he says.Ndior, a past president of the Francophone Network of International Law, is also involved in European efforts to make science and research findings more accessible to the public. As an ambassador for the Science Comes to Town (SCTT) project, he has participated in recent discussions on public perceptions of science and online misinformation. The European Commission-funded initiative connects Brest and two other cities — Kiel in Germany and Split in Croatia — and aims to strengthen ties between communities, universities and research institutions to promote science awareness and cooperation across Europe.Coordinated campaigns around contentious topicsNdior draws a clear distinction between critical thinking and thoughtless criticism. Yet he sees online discussions being increasingly shaped by suspicious behaviour and coordinated information campaigns — including "raids" aimed at dominating discussions and "astroturfing," where small groups act as larger movements to sway debates. Tracking these patterns has become harder because some platforms have restricted data or charge for it, despite provisions of the European Union's Digital Securities Act aimed at ensuring researchers can have access to such data. According to Ndior, "platforms became more reluctant from the moment access to data became a legal requirement rather than a voluntary initiative."Unfounded claims and scepticism about science existed long before Internet chat groups. But the noticeable rise in online hostility has intensified around contentious topics, such as the coronavirus pandemic and climate change, alongside the weakening of gatekeepers to moderate content.For Ndior, dubious claims about pandemic countermeasures and vaccine safety highlighted the struggle between "balancing freedom of expression and the protection of public health and order." Efforts to remove social media content deemed false or risky for public health triggered accusations of censorship and the silencing of legitimate discussion, and in some cases, legal challenges.Concerns about attacks on the credibility of scientists and researchers have generated a flurry of academic papers in recent years and prompted professional communities to address ways to counter online attacks. Such unease extends to the generation that has grown up with digital media. Ndior points out that his students, some of whom research artificial intelligence regulation, hate speech, online surveillance and other controversial topics, hesitate to share their work or viewpoints online. "Many of them don't want to expose themselves too much because they don't feel ready to be faced with the backlash of other people criticising their research," he explains.Safer harbours for engagementLegal challenges against false or defamatory posts are not necessarily a solution — especially given the trans-jurisdictional nature of the Internet. Lawsuits also take time and money, and if they fail, can be counterproductive. Instead, Ndior advises scientists and researchers to be selective in how and where they communicate. Professional online platforms and moderated discussion spaces offer a better environment for engagement. He also highlights the value of more traditional formats, such as radio interviews and in-person discussions at schools, libraries and science fairs, which encourage dialogue with the public. "Personal contact makes a big difference," he says, while acknowledging that these approaches lack the global reach of social media.Ndior’s interest in digital law and online misinformation stems from his time as a doctoral student in international law in the early days of social media. He began analysing posts from governments and heads of state to determine if they could be considered official and thus used as evidence in litigation. His work attracted media attention and led to conference and speaking invitations. "This was not part of my plan," he says, "but this is what happens as a researcher — your interest is sparked by a certain event or phenomenon, and it suddenly becomes your focus."Ndior believes SCTT provides "a double benefit" for researchers, enabling them to connect with peers and interact with the public. "There is a wide community of people who are not in academia who are critical thinkers looking for opportunities to ask questions, to get information and contribute their ideas,” he says. "I really value that kind of feedback."Science|Business, which connects policymakers, academics and industry through its news reporting, analysis and events, is an SCTT partner.
NCAA tournament live updates, scores: No. 1 Duke handling No. 2 UConn; Michigan routs Tennessee; UCLA, UConn women advance to Final Four
NCAA tournament live updates, scores: No. 1 Duke battling No. 2 UConn; Michigan routs Tennessee; UCLA, UConn women advance to Final Four
Health care fraud whistleblowers could make millions as Bessent cracks down on sprawling scams
Zuckerberg meeting ‘a slap in the face,’ says father who lost son to suicide after online scam
NCAA tournament live updates, scores: Follow Michigan vs. Tennessee, Duke vs. UCLA; UConn routs Notre Dame in women's March Madness
White sox rookie Munetaka Murakami joins Cleveland's Chase DeLauter as fourth player to hit home run in first 3 MLB games
NCAA tournament live updates, scores: Follow UConn vs. Notre Dame, Michigan vs. Tennessee as March Madness continues Sunday
Jackknifed big-rig catches fire, blocks ramp at Business 80, Highway 50 in Sacramento
Warner farm’s lavender business flourishes, enabled by USDA value-added grant program
Growth is at the top of Missy Biagiotti’s mind. Already, she counts on the help of more than 20 employees during the busiest months of the year at Lavender Fields at Pumpkin Blossom Farm in Warner, while new horizons lie ahead for the business she co-owns with her husband, Mike. The couple is adding three […]
Mental health center approved in 2004 remains closed while Miami-Dade city leaders delay plans
Celebrate business owners and community with Seattle Women's Network's April 4 soiree
Sen. Kim on Trump weighing sending service members to Iran: ‘One of the most consequential moments that I’ve ever seen’
GOP Rep. Mace: ‘Congress should have a say’ on whether Trump deploys US servicemembers into Iran
Miami Marketing Leader Bruce Turkel Talks Branding, Business Growth, and Miami’s Evolution on “Localized Miami”
Matthew McConaughey on Working with Family, Faith and Politics
In this favorite Sunday Sitdown, Oscar-winning actor Matthew McConaughey joins Willie Geist to discuss working with his family on “The Lost Bus,” seeing his son Levi follow in his acting footsteps, and adding bestselling author to his resume. McConaughey shares how the need for belief inspired him to write “Poems and Prayers” and opens up about a potential political career down the road.
NBA playoff picture March 29: All of the scenarios and stakes for postseason contenders down the stretch run
Trump administration news: No end in sight for the DHS shutdown
Tyler Sloat Joins Hinge Health Board As Growth And Discipline Focus
Hinge Health (NYSE:HNGE) appointed Tyler Sloat to its board of directors, adding a leader with experience in high growth technology companies. Sloat has held senior roles at companies that have gone through rapid expansion and IPOs. The appointment signals a focus on scaling Hinge Health's business and strengthening governance as the company matures. Hinge Health focuses on digital musculoskeletal care, a segment that sits at the intersection of healthcare and technology. As employers and...
Phil Weiser wins top spot in Colorado’s Democratic gubernatorial primary at party’s state assembly
Thousands of Corewell Health patients impacted by 2024 data breach
Beyond Wonderland festival draws large crowds, business to San Bernardino
China proposes a departure from impact factor to measure academic influence
Reds 3B Eugenio Suarez uses ABS challenge to counter back-to-back blown calls from umpire C.B. Bucknor
Turning big ideas into real business plans through the Latina Entrepreneur Academy
Illinois pulls away from Iowa late to reach first Final Four since 2005, end Hawkeyes' NCAA tournament run
Health officials confirm rabies case in raccoon found in Niagara County
NCAA tournament live updates, scores: Follow No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 9 Iowa, No. 1 South Carolina vs. No. 4 Oklahoma; Michigan, Texas women advance to Elite 8
Water projects getting a boost from record breaking Colorado sports betting revenue
With the Cardinals Intent on Protecting the Health of Ivan Herrera, the Club Could Notch A Statistical Oddity Early in the Season
Fire in Cass Lake, Minnesota, destroys business
Jonathan Bullard signing with Cowboys on emotional day
Cowboys sign veteran defensive lineman Jonathan Bullard late in free agency to continue adding to their 2026 defense
High School Sports Rally: Teen makes memories with Gophers women’s basketball team
Newcomers who stood out in Nebraska football’s spring game
Nebraska football fans got their first glimpse of the 2026 team with the Huskers' spring game on Saturday, March 28. Matt Rhule and company were aggressive in the transfer portal, adding 16 players to their team along with 11 incoming freshmen.