SCROLL NEWS / DISCOVERY

Search headlines

Find the stories shaping the conversation.

Search mode
Refine results
Active filters Keyword All time

Results for " truist " 33 found 🔀 AI-powered Shuffle

Regional Banks Put AI Into Core Operations as Business Lending Grows

Third-quarter results from PNC, U.S. Bancorp, Truist, Fifth Third, Regions and KeyCorp show that regional banks are putting artificial intelligence into

pymnts.com logo
Oct 20 • 4:07 PM EDT • Business • pymnts.com
Truist Financial Issues Pessimistic Forecast for Accel Entertainment (NYSE:ACEL) Stock Price

Truist Financial lowered their price target on shares of Accel Entertainment from $14.00 to $13.00 and set a "hold" rating on the stock in a research note on Tuesday.

marketbeat.com logo
Oct 20 • 11:30 AM EDT • Entertainment • marketbeat.com
Truist CEO shakes up bank's consumer, small business leadership

New Truist Financial CEO Mike Lyons revamped the Charlotte-based bank’s consumer and small business leadership and jettisoned one of the key digital initiatives of his predecessor CEO.

businessnc.com logo
Oct 16 • 10:20 AM EDT • Business • businessnc.com
Truist's new CEO is reshaping the bank's consumer and small-business leadership

Former Bank of America and PNC executives will report to CEO Mike Lyons as Truist consumer banking chief Dontá Wilson departs

qz.com logo
Oct 16 • 8:32 AM EDT • Business • qz.com
Truist’s Virginia regional president departs

Truist Financial’s Virginia regional president, Thomas Ransom, has left the company after five years in the role.

virginiabusiness.com logo
Oct 15 • 5:16 PM EDT • Business • virginiabusiness.com
What Netflix's 'The Altruists' gets wrong, according to former FTX exec

"The Altruists" is an eight-episode Netflix series dramatizing the rise and fall of the cryptocurrency exchange under former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried.

businessinsider.com logo
Oct 10 • 12:38 PM EDT • Business • businessinsider.com
MLB postseason turns to wild card Games 2 on Wednesday

The Dodgers could find out their National League Division Series opponent as early as Wednesday, with four more wild card games on the docket on the second day of the 2026 postseason. The Braves beat the Phillies on Tuesday at Truist Park in Atlanta thanks to a three-run home run in the eighth inning by […]

sports.yahoo.com logo
Sep 30 • 9:28 AM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
Braves Must Crush Phillies In Atlanta To End Playoff Ghosts

The Braves face the Phillies again at Truist Park. A look at the stats, the history, and why Atlanta needs to win this series at home.

sports.yahoo.com logo
Sep 28 • 9:00 PM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
Braves vs Phillies Game Thread: 9/12/2026

Join us and discuss tonight’s game in the comments below, as the Braves look to put another nail in Philly’s NL East coffin. Game Info Game Time: Saturday, September 12, 7:15 p.m. ET Location: Truist Park, Atlanta, GA Watch: BravesVision Radio/Audio: 680 AM / 93.7 FM The Fan

sports.yahoo.com logo
Sep 12 • 6:00 PM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
The politics and possibilities of ‘AI could kill us all’

I found myself fielding a lot of questions from folks who don’t usually talk much about AI this week. They were mostly along the lines of “do you think AI is going to kill us all?” or “how worried should I be about this human extinction stuff?” Motivating this wave of existential anxiety was the highly dramatic resignation of now-former Anthropic employee Jacob Coxon, who quit his job while publicly sharing his concerns about safety practices at the leading AI companies. More specifically, he declared that almost everyone at OpenAI and Anthropic, the leading AI labs, believes that there’s a decent chance the AI systems they’re producing could “kill us all” by the end of the decade, and the companies aren’t “acting responsibly.” Other AI safety researchers, including those still employed at Anthropic and OpenAI, all confirmed that yes, Coxon is correct, they’re all worried that their company’s products might prove fatal for the entire human race as well. Two more AI employees quit and joined the chorus. Now, the warning shot has been covered everywhere from the Wall Street Journal to Fox News to WIRED to the Guardian. I understand why all this sounds scary, but my response to those who have asked, has generally been: No, you don’t need to worry that AI will kill go rogue and kill us all. But that does not mean we shouldn’t worry, period. Far from it. The companies building AI products are now among the wealthiest and most powerful entities in the world. And they very much are building enormous engines of mass surveillance, extraction, and automation. They can and have allowed their AI systems to carry out felony hacks of other companies, provided the government with autonomously generated kill lists, and sold enterprise technology to firms around the world that is explicitly intended to replace jobs. But “AI” has done these things not because they have all-powerful minds of their own but, ultimately, because people have programmed, calibrated, and directed them to. In other words, it’s not AI we need to worry the most about. It’s the people and corporations working to profit from and gain power by deploying it. The technology is sophisticated, sure, and, especially in cybersecurity contexts, potentially disruptive to plenty of existing systems. But if we want to stop this predatory, profiteering, and extractive form of AI—and it’s worth noting that at this point, most people do—we absolutely can. A quick note/plea: I can only do all of this with the support of readers like you, so if you find value in independent, critical tech journalism and analysis, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I want to keep as much of this un-paywalled as absolutely possible, and I need your support to do so. Many thanks to all who continue to chip in, it’s very much appreciated. Onward. Subscribe First, some context: AI industry folks like Coxon have been discussing the prospect that AI will destroy humanity for years. Even before the beginning of the AI boom, many working in the industry, from the executive staff to the rank and file researchers, have obsessed over ‘x-risk’, or the possibility that AI will become sentient or semi-sentient and move one way or another to exterminate humanity. This is ostensibly why Elon Musk bankrolled OpenAI in the first place, and is the grounds for his lawsuit alleging OpenAI betrayed its charter by abandoning its nonprofit status to become a commercial enterprise. Many AI engineers and startup founders have calculated their own personal p(doom), or the probability that the tech product they are working on will initiate an actual humanity-extinguishing apocalypse. 10-25% p(doom)s are pretty common. (I wrote about a long weekend I spent among these folks at one of their top conferences here, to give you an idea of their ideas and belief systems.) Sam Altman himself drove the narrative of the imminent rise of a super-powerful AI, or artificial general intelligence, to prominence by declaring that the technology he was building posed an existential risk to humanity. This idea is in other words baked into the DNA of modern AI companies and into the products they engineer. It’s also why the industry is routinely accused, by myself and others, of “doom marketing,” ie, using such proclamations and framings to impart the sheer power of the technology behind your product onto investors, partners, consumers, and the state. Some ambient understanding of this tendency may have helped prevent the press from repeating the claim every time one of the x-risk folks made it over the years, including when they quit their jobs at AI companies while doing so. Yet Coxon’s AI x-risk alarm has broken containment, as they say, and has exposed the idea to the mainstream media once again. This has happened, I think, for a number of reasons. First, when AI CEOs were going around saying AI might kill everyone in 2023, their companies were well-capitalized, but not nearly to the extent they are today. They were more easily dismissed as eccentric geeks of the sort that Silicon Valley is supposed to produce. Now, not only do their products have much greater market saturation, but people are more aware of a) the often unethical ways the executives and companies comport themselves b) the other adverse impacts of AI that have already arrived, and c) the physical cost of building these systems, particularly when it comes to data centers. Finally, toss in the constant stream of headlines in 2026 about AI models going rogue or potentially upending the world’s infrastructure. [ ](https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/with-the-backlash-to-data-centers) [ With the backlash to data centers, Flock and AI glasses, a mass opposition to big tech is underway. Silicon Valley is in denial. ](https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/with-the-backlash-to-data-centers) Brian Merchant · Aug 27 [ Read full story ](https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/with-the-backlash-to-data-centers) As a result, general sentiment was already overwhelmingly skeptical of AI and its overlords, so the table was pretty well set for someone to come along and say ‘just a reminder, the companies that are building the product that promises to take your job and leave a data center in your neighborhood also think that it might exterminate the human race’ and get a strong reaction from the media and the public. The question is: Should we understand this stuff as hype, strategically fanned to feed already swelling valuations? Is it doom marketing? Genuine cause for alarm that the infrastructure that undergirds modern life is facing a novel threat vector? Or reason to be sincerely worried that AI companies are amassing too much power, and that their products are genuinely dangerous? The answer, I’m afraid, is “yes.” Let me try to untangle all of this a bit, because arguments over how to navigate this moment are extremely heated right now, as they are essentially arguments over how to approach the politics of AI at a moment where there may be a unique opening for action. Those sympathetic to AI alignment concerns and x risk arguments—which increasingly includes a faction on the left who want to shut down AI over safety concerns—argue that people who dismiss AI as all hype have their heads in the sand. Meanwhile, critics of the x-risk narrative—which I might note includes a cadre of investors and tech folks on the right, too—argue that it is hype and can be used to further inflate valuations or for pursuing regulatory capture. The challenge is that many feel that dismissing AI as just hype or purely marketing also diminishes the urgency of taking on the AI industry as the novel and threat to labor, civil society, and the public sphere it is; others that by accepting the industry’s own terms, we imbue it with undue power and enable it. But let’s be clear: Declarations that AI is so powerful it might end the world are a kind of marketing, and anyone who says otherwise is just as off base as those who say that’s all that it is. If you don’t think that these sub-trillion dollar companies have higher-ups who noticed that when their founders talked about super-powerful dangerous AI they got spikes in media interest and phone calls from investors, or that those founders didn’t notice that themselves, and lean into certain narratives to advantage their products, then I don’t know what to tell you. Not all marketing is a Pepsi ad campaign with a celebrity spokesperson. Yet confronting the AI industry should certainly be considered an urgent project. Do I share the x-riskers’ fear that out-of-control, super-intelligent AI agents might end the world? I do not. I’ve read a good deal of AI extinction literature over the last couple of years and I have not come across a credible, step-by-step documentation of how exactly AI might move from self-recursively improving AI to killing every single human on the planet. Most of what I’ve read seems predicated on a sort of reverse Ian Malcolmian logic: Eventually, it becomes smart enough and AI, uh, finds a way (to exterminate humanity). Are the AI companies also overstating and dramatizing what their products can do? Yes, pretty much all the time. They’re in a knife fight for market share and are trying to win customers and government contracts before their investors come knocking. And yet. They have concentrated enormous amounts of compute, have extensive data collection and surveillance capacities, have inserted themselves into the state in numerous capacities, including military kill chains, and they are being run by egomaniacal billionaires who are rushing to monopolize an entire new market. The way I think about their most recent frightening-seeming exploits is not as a “swarm of rogue AI agents building a new civilization” or whatever, but as corporations with a hitherto-unimaginable amount of compute at their disposal recklessly experimenting with automation programs, completely unafraid of any repercussions because we have been unwilling or unable to impose any on them. So I think we should welcome any newfound imperative to hold them accountable. I also think that ultimately, the AI critics, Pause AI folks, leftists, doomers, effective altruists, and, honestly, most of the public, want a lot of the same things: legitimate checks and limits on AI companies’ power, actual transparency into what the companies are doing, and for more of AI to be under public control. (Ultimately, a lot of what animates the x-risk fears are rooted in just that: a fear of losing control.) How we move towards all this, exactly, is the question of the day, and while there’s much to be argued over in terms of building a viable political platform to challenge the AI industry’s power, I do want to cast a vote against one particular approach. Not to pick on Chris here, as there are a lot of folks out there proposing stuff like this, and the policy ideas actually stem from AI safety groups. But not only would this be challenging to land politically (I can already hear the ‘China will beat us to AGI’ calls) and all but unworkable in practice, this approach is a) far too limiting, b) fails to address the current harms caused by AI and c) would likely only wind up serving Anthropic and OpenAI; it’s what regulatory capture looks like in action. Full model transparency is the floor for what should be on offer here. If these companies believe their products will kill us, the very least we deserve is to know how. It’s in the public interest. I would also argue we might get a lot of the way to stopping any currently envisioned robot apocalypse simply by forcing AI companies to assume liability, and to submit to the full brunt of the law. If Sam Altman were liable to be charged with a felony for approving the hack on Hugging Face1, if Google was forced to pay defamation fines each time it published a false and injurious AI Overviews, these companies might suddenly find cause to restrain their models’ output, and we might hear less about rogue AI. We would need to introduce new frameworks and available tools for tracking automated lawbreaking, to be sure, but I’d wager that little would frighten the AI companies more than actually being held accountable for what their products enable. To that end, Illinois has passed an AI liability law, which the industry fought tooth and nail, and Florida is considering one. The next steps would be towards moving AI under public control; again, it’s only reasonable, since everyone, not just AI insiders, should get a say over how a technology whose developers say might kill us is developed and deployed. Dismantling the whole industrial project as currently structured should be on the table, too, pending democratic input. But that’s for another post. For now, suffice to say that while I won’t be losing any sleep about an AI-enabled extinction event, Mr. Coxon and co. have given us an opportunity to underscore the urgency of the clear and present damage AI companies are doing, the extreme power they wield and the extent to which they hold themselves unaccountable, and the abundance of political capital there is out there for taking them on. Subscribe 1 Purely speculative! I do not know if he did or not.

bloodinthemachine.com logo
Sep 12 • 3:59 AM EDT • Politics • bloodinthemachine.com
Braves Sweep Dodgers Behind Chris Sale’s Masterpiece

The Atlanta Braves completed a statement series at Truist Park on Thursday night, sweeping the Los Angeles Dodgers with a 1-0 victory in the series finale. The win gave Atlanta three straight victories over one of the National League’s top teams and marked the Braves first sweep of the Dodgers since 2013. Atlanta’s pitching was…

sports.yahoo.com logo
Aug 27 • 10:23 PM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
Ozzie Albies Saves Braves From Dodgers Nightmare

The Atlanta Braves were struggling badly before Ozzie Albies stepped up. The team had lost 10 of their last 16 games and averaged only 2.9 runs per game. That all changed on Tuesday night at Truist Park. A two-out single by Albies off Tanner Scott in the eighth inning secured a 4-3 victory for the…

sports.yahoo.com logo
Aug 26 • 11:05 PM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
Accel Entertainment (NYSE:ACEL) Upgraded to "Hold" at Truist Financial

Truist Financial upgraded Accel Entertainment to a "hold" rating in a research note on Tuesday.

marketbeat.com logo
Aug 21 • 8:06 AM EDT • Entertainment • marketbeat.com
Truist says Meta has found its next $20 billion business, stock set to gain more than 40%

Analysts at Truist estimate Meta's new subscription model could generate over $20 billion in revenue by 2030.

cnbc.com logo
Jun 9 • 12:12 PM EDT • Business • cnbc.com
Banana Ball World Tour brings three nights of baseball entertainment to Truist Field
wcnc.com logo
Jun 4 • 7:33 AM EDT • Entertainment • wcnc.com
Deep dive
😐 Neutral (7%)
love
67%
wow
33%
Banana Ball World Tour brings three nights of baseball entertainment to Truist Field

Banana Ball is back in Charlotte, bringing its fast-paced, fan-focused version of baseball to Truist Field for three nights beginning Thursday. The Firefighters and Texas Tailgaters will face off June 4-6 as part of the Banana Ball World Tour and the inaugural season of the Banana Ball Championship League. Created by the Savannah Bananas, Banana Ball was designed to put entertainment at the center of the game.

sports.yahoo.com logo
Jun 4 • 6:58 AM EDT • Entertainment • sports.yahoo.com
Kristoffer Reitan earns 2-shot win at Truist Championship

The 28-year-old PGA Tour rookie from Norway shot 2-under 69 on Sunday to earn a two-shot win over Rickie Fowler and Nicolai Hojgaard in Charlotte.

spectrumlocalnews.com logo
May 10 • 7:29 PM EDT • Sports • spectrumlocalnews.com
Cameron Young shoots 63 at Quail Hollow, trails Alex Fitzpatrick by 2

Fitzpatrick was at 14-under 199 through 54 holes, one shot ahead of Norway's Kristoffer Reitan after each shot 64.

spectrumlocalnews.com logo
May 10 • 12:07 PM EDT • Sports • spectrumlocalnews.com
Deep dive
😐 Neutral (7%)
wow
52%
love
48%
Rory McIlroy shoots 67 to move into contention at Truist Championship

The world's No. 2 player heated up on the back nine Friday at Quail Hollow Club in Charlotte.

spectrumlocalnews.com logo
May 9 • 9:40 AM EDT • Sports • spectrumlocalnews.com
2026 Truist Championship odds, picks: Surprising predictions from golf model that's nailed 17 majors

Mike McClure's model has simulated the Truist Championship 2026 10,000 times and revealed PGA best bets

cbssports.com logo
May 6 • 7:30 PM EDT • Sports • cbssports.com
Deep dive
😐 Neutral (22%)
wow
41%
ahah
35%
love
24%
2026 Truist Championship odds, picks: Surprising predictions from golf model that's nailed 17 majors

Mike McClure's model has simulated the Truist Championship 2026 10,000 times and revealed PGA best bets

cbssports.com logo
May 5 • 8:06 PM EDT • Sports • cbssports.com
2026 Truist Championship tee times, TV coverage, viewer's guide

Tee times, TV coverage and viewer's guide for the Truist Championship at Quail Hollow Club in Charlotte, N.C.

sports.yahoo.com logo
May 5 • 1:53 PM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
2026 Truist Championship Odds: Rory McIlroy Favored in First Start Since Masters Win

Rory McIlroy is set to make his first start since his second straight win at The Masters. Here’s a look at the latest odds and best bets for the Truist Championship.

foxsports.com logo
May 5 • 1:37 PM EDT • Sports • foxsports.com
Humbled Brian Snitker inducted into the Braves Hall of Fame

Former Braves manager Brian Snitker sat up behind the podium in the press conference room at Truist Park one more time, and this time he was wearing a suit instead of a uniform. With his family in the front two rows, Snitker reflected prior to his induction as the 42nd member of the Braves Hall of Fame before Atlanta played the Philadelphia Phillies. “It’s humbling, and just it’s a great feeling,” Snitker said.

sports.yahoo.com logo
Apr 26 • 1:15 AM EDT • Sports • sports.yahoo.com
LIVE: Palmetto Sports at Atlanta Braves Opening Day

LIVE: On Atlanta Braves Opening Day, Palmetto Sports Anchor Caroline Soro & Reporter Ella Grogan preview game one from Truist Park.

foxcarolina.com logo
Mar 27 • 7:21 PM EDT • Sports • foxcarolina.com
Braves showcase new food and entertainment at Truist Park ahead of season opener

The Atlanta Braves showcased LED lights, a World Series dirt display and a colossal burger ahead of Friday's season opener.

atlantanewsfirst.com logo
Mar 24 • 6:42 PM EDT • Entertainment • atlantanewsfirst.com
Braves showcase new food and entertainment at Truist Park ahead of season opener

The Atlanta Braves showcased LED lights, a World Series dirt display and a colossal burger ahead of Friday's season opener.

peachtreetv.com logo
Mar 24 • 6:42 PM EDT • Entertainment • peachtreetv.com
Braves showcase new food and entertainment at Truist Park ahead of season opener

The Atlanta Braves showcased LED lights, a World Series dirt display and a colossal burger ahead of Friday's season opener.

cbs46.com logo
Mar 24 • 6:42 PM EDT • Entertainment • cbs46.com
😐 Neutral (17%)
wow
100%
Hinge Health, Inc. (HNGE) Delivers Strong Q4 Results and Optimistic 2026 Guidance, Truist Reaffirms Buy Rating

Hinge Health, Inc. (NYSE:HNGE) ranks among the most shorted stocks to buy according to analysts. On February 11, following the company’s fourth-quarter 2025 results, Truist Securities reaffirmed its Buy rating on Hinge Health, Inc. (NYSE:HNGE) and set a price target of $63 on the company’s shares. Analyst Jailendra Singh retained an upbeat assessment after a […]

finance.yahoo.com logo
Mar 4 • 2:30 AM EST • Health • finance.yahoo.com
$4B Gerber Kawasaki to Use Altruist for New Business

The RIA will also use Altruist’s AI platform, Hazel, which triggered a selloff in traditional wealth management stocks a few weeks ago.

wealthmanagement.com logo
Feb 24 • 2:52 PM EST • Business • wealthmanagement.com
Truist Reduces PT on Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) from $280 to $260, Reiterates ‘Buy’ Rating

Flutter Entertainment plc (NYSE:FLUT) is one of the best stocks to buy right now. On January 13, 2026, Truist reduced its price target on Flutter Entertainment plc (NYSE:FLUT) from $280 to $260, while reiterating a ‘Buy’ rating. While previewing 2026 for the U.S. gaming sector, the firm discussed the challenges from the previous year, including […]

finance.yahoo.com logo
Jan 18 • 6:16 AM EST • Entertainment • finance.yahoo.com
Wall Street Bets: Accel Entertainment, regional markets, New York online sports betting

Wall Street Bets is a roundup of recent notes from analysts covering the gambling industry.Accel Entertainment benefits from favorable terms for VGTsTruist Securities’ Patrick Keogh on December 24 looked at the prospects for Accel Entertainment, a supplier of video game terminals:“Yester

cdcgaming.com logo
Dec 29, 2025 • 7:09 AM EST • Entertainment • cdcgaming.com
The brain’s 5 eras, the vaccine that protects against dementia, altruistic ants

Science editor Ian Sample sits down with co-host Madeleine Finlay and science correspondent Hannah Devlin to hear about three eye-catching stories from the week

theguardian.com logo
Dec 4, 2025 • 12:00 AM EST • Science • theguardian.com
😐 Neutral (14%)
wow
75%
love
25%